The only thing I have found different about having a biological child and an adoptive child, is that when "issues" creep up with the adoptive child, I tackle them straight on without hesitation or embarrassment, but with full ownership of suppling a correction.
I first noticed this when I started seeking Early Intervention help for the Little Man. I went into the process seeking help with speech and anything else they saw that I might have missed or not known about. When we started therapy, I met with all the therapist and wanted to understand what they were going to do and how it all worked. When they gave progress reports, I also gave them progress reports from my end of what had changed in his abilities/behaviours, and what I thought was not where it should be. They were always a bit paused when they I told them what I still didn't think was moving along as much as I hoped.
Recently, with the state funded therapy, one of our therapist, the physical therapist, left the agency we are working with and the new therapist wanted to give me her assessment. She did hesitantly, and when I agreed that the Little Man is still lacking significantly in stomach and upper body muscle tone, she commented that often parents became offended when she raised this particular issue. I told her everything I see and what I want to concur with him. She is on board.
I also saw this when my sitter had to take the Little Man to therapy for the first time. She didn't tell the other sitters, although I'm totally open about the amount of therapy he's undergoing. None of the therapy is life-long stuff in my opinion. It all is about catching him up to the 'Norm' and giving him any tools he need that he may have missed at the appropriate age/development stage. She came back from that first session telling me that there were three other sitters there with kids she knew but didn't know any of them were receiving therapy.
So, I go for what he needs. I talk about it and I don't hide it at all. In fact I've suggested therapy to others that hadn't even wanted to consider the need. But since I blame it on lack of stimulation/opportunity to explore the appropriate development milestones at the age most kids hit, I take little ownership to the cause of his delays. I take full ownership of finding the tools to correct the delays.
The outcome of this, is the surprise for me. The Big Boy, although 5, and now wanting to write his name, which he mostly does really well, does not memorize as quickly/well. He knows the difference between numbers and letters, but he doesn't recognize all the letters 1-9, and cannot recite the alphabet. I wish he could. I work with him to try and make numbers and letters fun. But I have felt bad on occasion that I'm not doing enough. But with the issues with the Little Man, I have no personal concerns about whether I'm doing enough, I just do what I can.
So far, this is the one difference I find. Ownership of the shortfalls. And you know what, the reality of the adoption, is teaching me that I shouldn't take ownership of the cause of any disappointments I have with the Big Boy, but that I should just continue to find the tools to help them grow, not focus on the delay itself.
